Case demonstrates authoritarian governance through criminalization of political activity and protest, though limited dystopian impact given specificity to two individuals rather than systemic mass repression.
The two, a political consultant and a translator, denied allegations of fomenting protests last year.
Corporate-backed criminal prosecution against rights advocates attempting to defend communities from mining operations demonstrates… [more]
Documents state intimidation of student protesters and potential governmental suppression of dissent in India, showing patterns of… [more]
Documents state use of excessive force against peaceful protesters and mobile internet suspension by Indian authorities, exemplifying… [more]