Ignoring EFF’s warnings about the
dangers
and
impossibility
of implementing a new mandate for
3D print surveillance software
, the California State Assembly has signed off on legislation to do just that. In the process, legislators amended the bill to make it even more confusing, while failing to address the risks to privacy, speech, and consumer rights. We must renew our call on legislators to drop this bill as it heads to the state senate, and protect the tools of creators in the state.
Take action
Tell CA Senators to stand with creators
What’s changed about the bill?
Since
we first wrote about AB 2047
, a bill targeting 3D printers for the rare, impractical, and
already outlawed
practice of manufacturing firearms without a license, it has picked up several amendments. Some are welcome changes, but most have only highlighted the technocratic absurdity of the proposed scheme. Our core concerns
—
that this mandate censors lawful speech, builds out corporate surveillance, and criminalizes open source experimentation
—
have not been remedied.
Removes criminalization of resale
Starting with one silver lining, the current bill includes a carveout for the private resale of devices. The original bill would have made it a criminal offense for an individual to resell 3D printers purchased before this mandated censorship and surveillance software. This is a clear win for the 3D-printing community, but it is unfortunately not enough.
Ineffective carveouts for open source
One of the most dangerous aspects of the bill is that it criminalizes
individual users
for common practices, like creating and using alternative open source programs with their 3D printer. New amendments provide a carveout for the use of an open source tool, but only if it includes compliant censorship software. The bill burdens open source developers with ambiguous and unrealistic standards for print blocking, and continues to create a chilling effect for open source users.
Rem
… [more]
